
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Kommentarer på: Demokrati och modern övervakning	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://radiolars.com/2013/08/18/demokrati-och-modern-overvakning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://radiolars.com/2013/08/18/demokrati-och-modern-overvakning/</link>
	<description>Lars Lundebergs hemsida</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 10:00:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		Av: Dennis Nilsson		</title>
		<link>https://radiolars.com/2013/08/18/demokrati-och-modern-overvakning/#comment-1432</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dennis Nilsson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2014 22:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://radiolars.com/?p=1535#comment-1432</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Väl värd läsning här: 

Debating Secrecy vs. a Free Press
http://consortiumnews.com/2014/03/22/debating-secrecy-vs-a-free-press/

&quot;The term “spring offensive” may to be out of favor in the media, but more than 50 organizations endorsed a forum this past Friday with some of the media’s best known editorial heavyweights, to discuss the most serious crisis journalistic freedom has faced in decades: a deepening collision over leaks with what has become a national surveillance state.

This media event about the media is about the further erosion, if not the end, of a free press as we have known it, but the press couldn’t bother to cover it. They had other priorities like Kim Kardashian’s first presence on the cover of Vogue.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Väl värd läsning här: </p>
<p>Debating Secrecy vs. a Free Press<br />
<a href="http://consortiumnews.com/2014/03/22/debating-secrecy-vs-a-free-press/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://consortiumnews.com/2014/03/22/debating-secrecy-vs-a-free-press/</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The term “spring offensive” may to be out of favor in the media, but more than 50 organizations endorsed a forum this past Friday with some of the media’s best known editorial heavyweights, to discuss the most serious crisis journalistic freedom has faced in decades: a deepening collision over leaks with what has become a national surveillance state.</p>
<p>This media event about the media is about the further erosion, if not the end, of a free press as we have known it, but the press couldn’t bother to cover it. They had other priorities like Kim Kardashian’s first presence on the cover of Vogue.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
